Perhaps you misunderstand my work. It is not about queueing up to speak and be seen and be heard, but to primarily speak through be writing, and be seen through reading and reflecting, and be heard through the dialogues we have, in this same existence, and in the future speaking with the past. Such communication does not greedily seek publicity and rewards and fame and status.
The work need not be bound and shut between the covers of books, accessed only if you belong and buy and own limited print runs that will yellow as white paper, or will be encrypted digitally till the data is one day corrupted or commercially forgotten. It is a living, breathing creature of open access, ever in mutually beneficial communication, often tweaked and updated as it variously inspires reforms and transforms perspectives.
Ask whether you serve twin master and mistress of vanity and utility, and if both are in conflict, which side do you cleave to? For the sake of being known and glamorous and seen and present and publicly spoken? Or for the cause of being pragmatic and sensible, of being frugal and resourceful? Top down or bottom up?